I'd be happy to do that.
The subcommittee at some point will meet and it will discuss what happens next. The way I would envision this happening is that we complete what are essentially five items before the committee: three studies and two pieces of legislation.
Once that is done, the subcommittee will meet. We'll say that we have this motion and we have other possible issues. They will discuss, as the subcommittee does, and then they will submit a report to us as the main committee. That report will be adopted and it will say that we will do this and then this in this order for this many meetings. That's how we'll proceed.
That's how we got the current agenda. The studies we're working on were discussed at the subcommittee. A report came out of the subcommittee. We're simply saying that this proposed study will happen in a manner prescribed by the subcommittee on agenda and procedure and that will be after a report has come from the subcommittee to the main committee prescribing the manner in which it is to proceed. That will take place following the completion of the committee's work on the issues we're currently studying, as well as legislation.
That's our proposal.