Thank you very much. I wouldn't want to be accused of speaking when I didn't have the floor.
Could you clarify if comments about the situation in Ukraine would, in your view, be deemed relevant? It seems to me that the subamendment changes the requirements around the study in Ukraine. Whereas the previous amendment requires the completion of the study in Ukraine, the subamendment would eliminate the requirement for the completion of the study on Ukraine to proceed. It would seem to me that when it come to comments about the situation in Ukraine, although the subamendment doesn't add or remove the word “Ukraine”, it changes the words immediately before the word “Ukraine”, and it changes whether the completion of a study or simply a decision about the study would be required.
It would seem to me, based on that, quite obvious that discussion about the situation in Ukraine is relevant, and Ms. Gray is speaking about the situation in Ukraine. Could you maybe just clarify your ruling? Are comments about the situation in Ukraine relevant to the subamendment? I think they obviously are.