Thank you for that.
It would not be unusual, though, for a member to give an indication of what he or she may be proposing as an amendment in the context of a debate. That could be done. It's not proposing the amendment. It is suggesting what the proposed amendment might possibly be, which would just give us some indication.
However, I would like to work in good faith. We are not wedded to the five meetings. It could be three. It could be two. It could be nine. It depends on what the subcommittee on agenda comes up with. We're very willing to leave it to that. We're also very willing to leave the scheduling of this this work to after we've done the important work that we're already doing.
We do want to finish the study on vaccines. We do want to finish the statement on Ukraine. We do have two pieces of legislation that are coming before the committee. We recognize that. We're not dumb. We know that we have work to do. But we would like this motion passed so that next fall, or whenever we finish with the agenda as it is laid out, we could deal with it. We're not trying to bump any work. What we're trying to do is indicate that this is work that we would like to do in the fall.
I'm looking around at our team. Are we okay to trust them?