Mr. Chair, on my original point of order, I would never presume to tell the chair what to do; however, by definition, a point of order is exactly what Mr. Morantz was arguing it is not. A point of order is exactly suggesting to the chair that we follow the standing orders of the committee. It has been done by Mr. Genuis numerous times when he suggested that the chair should be doing something.
I want to be absolutely clear about that. That doesn't mean I won't contest the chair at some point, because every member can always contest the chair's ruling to see if we have majority support.
At this point, I'm simply reminding the members of the committee that relevance is required. It is in the standing orders, and I would hope that the chair would acknowledge that and either ask the member to move on or to rule the member out of order at some point. That can be done in any committee.