I was saying that I have some doubts given what Mr. Oliphant just said. I thought the problem was only with the last part of the amendment. In light of Mr. Genuis's comments, perhaps it wasn't really a problem. Perhaps a language nuance is to blame for my thinking that the last part of the amendment referred specifically to the study on women's reproductive health.
Mr. Genuis seems to be saying that the last part of his amendment relates to any topic that comes to the committee for consideration or study in the fall. That wasn't how I understood the last part, so it might just come down to a language nuance, as I said.
What Mr. Oliphant just said about the first part, I find a bit unsettling. It's not that I don't think we should finish what we started, but we will need to decide whether to finish our study on Taiwan or recommend that the Special Committee on the Canada–People’s Republic of China Relationship continue that work.
I have to tell you, Mr. Chair, that, at this point, I'm not really sure where I stand on Mr. Genuis's amendment.