Ms. Bendayan, thank you for that.
Again, as you can accept and as we can all agree here, relevance is elastic, but the subamendment before us is a pithy one. I think we can all agree that the scope of the debate is very limited in this instance.
Given the numerous points of order that the members have asked for, in the event that a member does not keep their comments relevant and they continue to repeat the same thing, they will have to cede the floor to the next person on the list.