Thank you, Mr. Oliphant.
It seems like those are eminently reasonable. I think there is agreement among all the members on those three specifications.
Did we want to put that to a vote? Is it the will of the committee that we have a recorded division?
(Amendment as amended agreed to: yeas 11; nays 0 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Thank you very much. That's the second issue we've dealt with. Thank you for the spirit of compromise amongst all the members.
Now, in the main, could we keep our comments reserved to the third issue, which is the witnesses we should be hearing from? There have been some suggestions of additions of individuals and stakeholders we should hear from, but if anyone would like to speak to that, please keep it limited to that specific issue.
Next up we have Mr. Chong.
