I could try it.
There's one thing I want to clarify. In the motion that we did approve, Mr. Genuis's motion, we did remove the (e) that referred to the sanctions study. That was removed in that initial one. I think it is reasonable, considering the importance of sanctions to what is happening in Ukraine. We know that if the sanction regimes are not robust, they are allowing Russia to continue the violence against Ukraine, so I do think sanctions are very important.
My recommendation is that we do one or perhaps two meetings before Christmas on sanctions, and that we complete the study with looking at sanctions of other areas after the holiday break.
So really, we would be looking at only those two meetings now, and then we would postpone two meetings to a later date. That would be a compromise that would allow....