I believe they're compatible.
First off, I should clarify that actually our association is not focused on the extraction of fuels but on the delivery of fuels, so our member companies are delivering gas energy right across the country. Overwhelmingly right now it's natural gas, but increasingly it's RNG, as it is increasingly in Quebec. Hydrogen, of course, is also an emerging opportunity.
The fundamental point here about what we do is that delivering gas energy has an enormous economic benefit and an enormous security benefit, and it's a benefit that the Europeans recognize.
To your specific point about how you reconcile a country like Canada, which is a natural resource-producing and resource-exporting country, increasing its exports in the face of targets we've set, I think the government has created an enormous challenge for itself with its emissions cap. I would say, however, that when you look at the performance record of Canadian companies across the value chain and you compare them to those of our global allies, we perform extraordinarily well. Our standards are as good as or better than virtually everyone else's in the world. If you think of Europe receiving resources from a place like Russia, where the standards are much lower and emissions are much higher, and you reflect on it in a global context, then you see that Canada could be contributing to lowering global emissions in a profound way. Are we making the perfect the enemy of the good by setting standards internally that prevent us from delivering much better benefits to the globe at large?