Mr. Chair, once again, I take issue with this argument that we should reject our colleagues proposed amendments simply on the grounds that we need to prevent this bill from being returned to the Senate. I find this argument completely inadmissible. I'd like us to be able to discuss our NDP colleague's proposed amendments on their merits, not on the basis of tactical considerations that have no place in this discussion.
I reiterate that the amendment before us from our NDP colleague is worthwhile because it voices some of the concerns that have been outlined for us. We could choose to ignore the concerns we've heard. Again, I understand that the government is not ignoring them, since the minister is considering introducing his own bill, as he believes this one doesn't go far enough. It's all well and good to ignore what's been laid out before us, but Ms. McPherson should be commended for taking the time to voice some of the concerns.
Once again, I will be voting in favour of this proposed amendment.