If I may, let me go back, as this is something that, in some way, addresses your question.
Our Minister of Foreign Affairs recently made statements to local media. She was clearly stating that the ongoing investigation into what happened in Peru will uncover the source of the funds of those financing the violent groups. Recently, the judiciary detained two people allegedly linked to the financing. We are closely following the outcome of these investigations.
Unfortunately, we witnessed violent groups taking advantage of these demonstrations—as was mentioned earlier—in order to commit serious attacks against law enforcement, public and private property and critical infrastructure. This is very important to take into account.
Since the protests began, the airports of Arequipa, Cuzco, Juliaca, Andahuaylas and Ayacucho—five airports—have been attacked 18 times, some of them simultaneously. Likewise, more than 40 offices of public institutions have been attacked, including six superior courts, 14 offices of the judiciary, 13 police stations and several offices of the public prosecutor. In addition, there have been attacks on private property, such as the houses of congressmen in the provinces, as well as the looting of companies and businesses.
A total of 4,084 judicial files were burned during acts of vandalism against judicial offices of the superior courts of Arequipa, Apurimac, Ayacucho, Huancavelica and Puno. According to the judicial powers, the joint political motivation of possibly burning judicial files—in order to obstruct judicial processes in areas highly affected by illegal activities, such as drug trafficking, illegal mining or smuggling—has not been discarded.
These acts of violence must be categorically rejected by all citizens who seek a democratic country. Again, I say that violence is an unacceptable way to address social demands.