Just quickly, I would hope the government would pay attention to the recommendations out of the Senate committee, which I was not involved in making, and this committee, as in the past. That would be my first step.
Second, I think to have it go ahead is to understand what implementation will mean when we get to the level beyond seizure. If it's forfeiture, who gets the amount? We have an act that deals with the freezing of assets. We need to look at that again. That act came in very quickly. I was involved in that one. But we knew that it was our first attempt, and it was as a result of a crisis, and then it was amended and amended. I think this is what the government has to do—involve more consultation and dialogue to get the evidence. The evidence is all those other parts.