That's a complicated question.
Part of the challenge, of course, is that governments are still intervening very aggressively in support of fossil fuels and subsidizing them in multiple different directions. I think there remain embedded policy contradictions in terms of where we're going.
We're not necessarily leaving that to the marketplace. We are still intervening quite significantly in favour of fossil fuels. The estimates on the extent of subsidization of the fossil fuels sector in Canada vary. I see figures of anywhere from $3 billion or $4 billion up to $18 billion a year, depending on how you count. Some people would count Trans Mountain on top of that.
To come back to the LNG aspect, there have been persistent questions about the economic rationale. Certainly, going east doesn't seem to work, very simply, and going west is trickier.
