I hate to interrupt my colleague, but I have a point order, which takes precedence.
I will just preface the point of order by saying I will be fully supportive of this motion when it comes.
I believe that right now our order of business is on a point of order on whether or not the motion is within the scope of the study. I think that is not a debatable piece. If there's a contestation to that, we can have the debate on the point of order, but not on the subject of the matter.
I would think it would be important for the chair to rule on whether it's in order. Then we could maybe have a quick discussion about whether we need to vote on this today or whether or not we need to get to our business meeting.
I think there is a question about validity and that is yours to rule on.