That's an excellent question.
I think there's much Canada is already doing in its leadership role, not only as a convenor but also in marking the critical nature of its governmental relationship with this massive Ukrainian Canadian diaspora.
In this manner, I think that Canada actually illustrates a couple of things that are really important. One thing that I'm very mindful of these days, as an American, is how we treat the stranger, how we welcome them into our community and the mark that it makes, the difference it makes, even for the accountability work that actors like ICRUC are trying to do. It's also for the broader stabilization impact that can happen around the world.
That is a leadership message that can be shared and exemplified across that broader coalition: It's to think about what can happen and how other signatories can do more. They could perhaps think more about the kind of environment they want to offer at home and how they can perhaps be a little more Canadian in their approach.
I hope that provides some guidance.
