Thank you very much, Mr. Guilbeault.
I have a very simple saying. We can’t replace American assistance, we can’t imagine doing that. However, we can be good at what needs to be done. We can invest in this area, and Canada has been very active in the area of climate change. It has provided support to organizations like the Global Green Growth Institute, or GGGI, and a group like ARC, or the African Risk Capacity, which helps businesses and countries to adapt to climate change. We have made meaningful investments here and put real assets in place to address the climate challenge. However, I’m sorry but I can’t put on rose-coloured glasses, we can’t replace American aid. We don’t have the resources to do that. Development assistance had already been eroded. That’s what I was trying to tell Mr. Brunelle‑Duceppe earlier.
Erosion does not mean we must not invest. Instead, it means that we have to be more creative now. We can no longer continue to do business as before, and Africans themselves are already working hard to make changes. Members would be delighted to see the technologies they are deploying, the methods they are now using to adapt to climate change and to endure climate crises for which they bear little responsibility. These crises originate elsewhere and bring incredibly difficult conditions.
I’ll share one final example quickly. A minister of finance once told me that just as they try to recover from the latest climate crisis—whether flooding or drought—another strikes. The same countries are then expected to have hospitals and schools that work, technologies, and so forth. In the situation at hand, Canada can provide assistance, and not just because it has to provide development assistance. Canada can take part in reconstruction, and even do business. That’s what I’m trying to promote. In the area of climate change, no one knows all the answers. We just have to be creative and do our part.