I mean, when it comes to the international community.... That's what I tried to stress in my speech. Syria is a country that is totally devastated. Its people were killed—over 500,000 people by the most conservative estimates—and tens of millions of people left the country. There's no economy, no security and no safety. It is in ruins.
Of course, the Syrian government and people cannot repair the damage just by themselves, so any kind of international support is needed. Legitimacy, reconstruction funds and normalization, I totally agree with these, but all of this should happen in a conditional way. Make sure that the regime in Syria is not going to be another repressive, authoritarian, centralized regime.
The previous one was secular, and this one may be Islamist, but the nature of power is important. Is it going to be a decentralized democratic government, including all kinds of communities, not just ethnic and sectarian communities but women and secular forces in society—or not? If the current president of the country and the people around him are not willing to have a democratic government, then of course the international community should have reservations. That is why I say any engagement should be strictly conditional.