Yes, but they're getting arrested based upon their belief. They're just practising their faith.
You can also take people like Vladimir Kara-Murza, who was standing up for democracy. Right now, under “human rights defender”, maybe that falls in, but I think “prisoners of conscience” fits better. I think that maybe we should look at my colleagues across the way when we start working on amendments and possibly do a combination and make sure both terms are used, so that we are inclusive and specific enough that nobody slips through the cracks.
Would you be okay with that?