Before I begin my time, I have a point of order. I didn't want to interrupt the previous person.
I want clarification—and I believe I'm correct on this—that it would be inappropriate for me to comment on discussion on the previous bill around the definitions of “human rights defenders” or “prisoners of conscience” that took place in camera and agreements that might have been reached the last time, because it was an in camera meeting. I cannot bring that up at this meeting. Am I correct on that?