Yes, it is a large question. I don't want to dodge it, but at the same time, it will come down to very specific outcomes.
As I mentioned earlier, what we achieve on autos matters a great deal down to small percentages. What we achieve on steel and aluminum matters a great deal if this is broadly applied or if it's full of carve-outs—to the point Ms. Tronnes made. Our negotiators will have to strike a deal that includes a number of elements, and some groups will be more satisfied than others in what those are. I can't tell you what a mutually beneficial agreement would be, because there could be several scenarios that would be mutually beneficial. It really does come down to the details, and I would encourage us to think about the details as the potential outlines of a deal emerge.