Thank you for that.
I don't want to focus too much on one dimension. However, I still want to come back to this idea of expanding critical mineral development in Canada, because I think that largely commits the north, which is where the main critical minerals are located.
To be able to do that, we need infrastructure. From what I understand of your reality, there is already a crying need for infrastructure in the north. To put infrastructure in place, people have to live on the land. I don't want to have a purely mercantile vision. That's not my goal. However, to set up infrastructure, there has to be economic development and people living on the land.
I don't know how you see this possibility of linking economic development, which involves natural resource development, with the associated infrastructure.
Is that something that could be part of your mandate?