To me, and this is just my own personal interpretation of it, there was a lot of criticism early on about the value of the property, and if you recall, there were estimates that were put out in The Globe and Mail about what they thought the properties were worth.
If you look at the documents that were around, like the BMO and Royal Bank study, you can find numbers that are fairly close to those in The Globe and Mail, and they were probably the source of them. But the government was, of course, aware that they wanted to be seen to be making a good deal, and making more money than what had been anticipated in this earlier item.
So what they did was to make a very simple adjustment, which is perhaps the best way of putting it. I wouldn't call it a trick. The lease price was revised upward by about $2 a square foot on all of the properties between the time the offer was put out for bid and the earlier studies that were the basis for the Royal Bank and BMO studies and the leaks to The Globe and Mail, etc.
So already they had set themselves up to do better, because they were saying “We'll give you more money, and you should pay more money. We're going to give you another $2 a square foot for 25 years. That's worth something to you, isn't it?” Of course it is, and that's why the bid prices that came in were at or even slightly above some of the prices that had appeared in those earlier articles. But in the interim, the value of the lease had gone up by $2 a square foot on average.
I don't have them with me, but we have those two columns of leases, the amounts in the two different documents. If you don't have them in the documents already provided to you, we'd be happy to make them available. I believe we can do that.