Mr. Rate, I still don't see the benefit to the government in any guarantee kind of way. If, for instance, it used to cost us $5 billion to manage all those buildings and you came along on a tender and said, “I can do it for $4.8 billion”, we would know we were going to have a saving. But all you have done is say, “I'll manage it for you, and whatever it costs, it costs, plus my markup.” On a cost-plus basis, you've taken over the management of the maintenance of all our buildings, but there is no guaranteed savings. You're saying that, by audit annually, it has shown there to be some savings. We haven't seen those figures yet.
On April 1, 2005, you entered into a four-year contract with the government to manage the maintenance of these buildings. What was the total value of that contract?