Listen, as I said, this was, and I suspect still is, a huge endeavour involving significant logistics. When I became minister, this project had already begun several years earlier. I was not the initiator of this. The work around the Hill had begun several ministers before me, and I suspect will continue several ministers after Ms. Ambrose, because the scope of the project is huge.
The minister gets a briefing on the scope of the project, but we don't dive, nor should we, into who the folks are who are going to work on the roof, and on who the guys are who are doing the cement work, and who's going to deliver the trees in front, and who's going to be providing furniture for the new buildings. This is just not the way it should be run. The department has qualified people to do that. If there is a problem, it will obviously be elevated to an ADM. If it's significant, it'll go up to the DM. And if the DM can't resolve it, he'll bring it to me.
But I don't remember us ever having a discussion around a particular contract that was causing grief to the department around the Hill renovations. It's not to say that the project itself wasn't an issue--it is, because it's huge--but there were no significant issues brought to my attention relating to one particular contract.