I want to thank you for the question, because it's a really good one.
In this specific case, the performance of the senior executives who were responsible and were reporting directly to the DM was assessed. We have tools in place within the federal government and those were used. The one thing I believe is that there was no ill intent. I don't think these people woke up in the morning to make the system crash.
Looking now at everything and all the information we have, yes, they made mistakes, but even the Auditor General pointed out that there were other issues of oversight, of governance. To bring it down to two or three people is, I think, not to understand the complexity of this whole thing.
The people were assessed, their performance was assessed with the tools that we have, and I think this was noticed—I know it was in my department—and it's a question of balance, of being fair in our assessment of mistakes.