Thank you, Mr. Jowhari.
Mr. Wernick, thanks for your time.
I just want to ask a couple of quick questions. The first one, if you could be kind enough to provide a response to us in writing or write another book on it, is regarding procurement. Canada obviously has an issue with defence procurement. One issue we have is that someone who is a deputy minister in Immigration today might transfer over to Defence the next day, and they're told, “Hey, guess what, you're buying F-35s.” We don't have the longevity in positions or the scale that perhaps England or the U.S. does. I'd certainly love to hear from you on training issues or how we can build up a proper defence procurement staff.
But I want to get back to something that might be a bit more anecdotal. A couple of years ago I “Order Papered” all of the contracts for the outside consultants—many hundreds of pages. I went through and picked out individual ones on everything from auditing the strawberry festival to doing random RFP fairness checks repeatedly on the same RFP. I looked at that example and then I looked at the Nuctech. We studied Nuctech in this committee. It was about giving a contract or a standing offer to a Chinese security company to provide scanners for our embassies, and the government stepped back from that. It was great, but they said, “Well, we'll investigate how it happened” and they went to my favourite, Deloitte, and gave them a quarter of a million dollars for a report that basically said don't buy sensitive security equipment from despotic regimes.
For fun, I went to West Edmonton Mall and filmed a video asking random people if they would buy security equipment from despotic regimes. Everyone said no. Why did we pay a quarter of a million?
You talked about generalizing and, yes, these consultants have a lot of experience that isn't available in the public service, but how do we get past these kinds of contracts, the government sending out almost CYA contracts. We have a public service to do fairness checks. Why do we need to subcontract that out? We have a public service to say don't buy such equipment—
We're getting rather short on time. I'm happy to have you come back. I'm happy to have you put it in writing to us, but if you are able to give a quick, one-minute comment, I'd appreciate that.