I think so, to some degree. For a lot of the policies, it depends on how they're constructed. One of the challenges that you can see.... Let me use the example of Poland. Poland sees the threat as being extremely high. They have, in many of their procurements, just completely disregarded any reciprocal offset formula for their systems. Often, in cases, you'll see the cost of their procured capability compared to a country like.... Let's say that they bought F-16s several years ago. They could be 20% to 30% lower just because there's no reciprocal offset, and that's because they're buying a finished good from another country, and the offset policy does basically incur additional costs. It can frequently have that effect.
Now, often the question is, are we buying something that's going to ensure there's a sustainable industry, as I talked about before, about licensed production, or is this going to be something that ends after the last aircraft or whatever is produced? Those are questions. It can very easily increase costs. Historically, in Canada, some of this has actually increased cost significantly when we have had a buy Canada policy. It has to be weighed between what your industrial effect is and what we are trying to achieve going forward.