Absolutely, I would strongly recommend that there be some earmarked funding and earmarked deliverables around that. Particularly around LGBT seniors, and also for younger folks who are dealing with disabilities, far more will interact with home care than will necessarily interact with long-term care facilities.
I remember having a conversation with home care case managers some years ago. They were asking, “How do I even broach this?” The particular case manager I was talking to was a lesbian, and she was saying, “I'm seeing these seniors who I'm darn sure are a couple, but they're not framing themselves as a couple. They're saying that they're roommates.”
They were going in because there were health concerns, and one of them was becoming frail. They didn't have legal status, and they weren't going to have legal status because they weren't claiming to be a common-law couple, which then had a lot of impact in terms of whether they would be eligible for survivor benefits. There were also questions about what would happen about substitute decision-making. This lesbian home care provider didn't know how to open those conversations.
There's a lot of vulnerability in home care as well as long-term care. There are particular issues again for transpeople about what questions you have to ask. If you have to provide very personal care, help them with bathing and toiletting, and somebody's body may not be what's expected, how do you do that really sensitively and respectfully? Again, these are areas where there's a lot of fear, and a lot of possibility for improvement and for good care with support.