Evidence of meeting #65 for Health in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was board.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Matthew Herder  Director, Health Law Institute, Dalhousie University, As an Individual
Douglas Clark  Executive Director, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

I didn't think it had anything to do with the PMPRB, so it's fair to say that all those meetings with industry groups were to benefit Canadians in their access to non-patented drugs. Is that correct?

12:10 p.m.

Executive Director, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board

Douglas Clark

I wasn't privy to those meetings, so I have no idea what the subject matter was.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

The timing is pretty obvious, isn't it?

May 2nd, 2023 / 12:10 p.m.

Executive Director, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board

Douglas Clark

It overlapped with our consultations.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Moving on to the definition of the word “suspend”, as it's been brought up once or twice, in English the letter said, “respectfully consider temporarily delaying”. Do you think that suspending—implying temporarily delaying or requesting further consultation or consideration—is undue interference or is making a very direct recommendation?

12:10 p.m.

Executive Director, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board

Douglas Clark

I've never seen an English copy of that letter. The only copy I have says:

Sur la base de ces considérations, je demande respectueusement au Conseil d'envisager de suspendre le processus de consultation.

I take you at your word that this is the English translation.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Your French is better than mine, and I heard the translation as well. The words are “consider temporarily suspending”.

12:10 p.m.

Executive Director, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

I think it's fair to suggest that the interpretation of that, whether it's in French or English, has been broadly interpreted.

I'd like to correct the record on one thing before I move on. No attempt from the PMPRB to brief me, as parliamentary secretary, has ever come through my office or through any of my staff.

Moving on now, last week we had a meeting with Mélanie Bourassa Forcier. She received only about 30 minutes for an opportunity to provide testimony to this committee. Out of fairness, now that we are upwards of an hour for these two witnesses, I move to adjourn this meeting.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Sean Casey

A motion to adjourn is not debatable. We'll go straight to a vote.

12:10 p.m.

Bloc

Luc Thériault Bloc Montcalm, QC

One moment. I don't understand, Mr. Chair.

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Sean Casey

He put forward a motion to adjourn this meeting.

The vote is on “Shall the meeting now be adjourned?”

(Motion agreed to)

The meeting is adjourned.