I think Ms. Bradford has a fair amount, so I'll be brief and give her an opportunity to say a little more.
With regard to the point that's just been made, softening some of the restrictions so you might still achieve some of the objectives you want would I think be a very worthwhile thing to look at. And the issue of the number of voters that someone can vouch for, I suggest, doesn't really make sense in terms of the objectives of the amendments, and it is a very serious obstacle. We could have the option, for example, in the downtown eastside of having--I think I earlier gave the example--someone who works in the local community centre who might know two or three dozen people quite well, who sees them every day. People there use centres like that a lot because they don't have other facilities; they don't have homes that have comfortable facilities. I can't think of any reason why that person wouldn't be able to vouch for three dozen voters, if that's the case. You would still achieve the objectives you're seeking, but it would at least assist significantly in making sure that people who are citizens get to vote on election day.