Thank you.
That was quite a short round.
It's unusual for me to do this, but I'm going to ask for clarification on one thing; that is, on this statutory declaration. I'm not a lawyer. My background is not law. But I did hear one of the witnesses--I'm not sure which one--suggest that in the statutory declaration sometimes we ask you to go through your pockets, and you might have a prescription or something like that. I'm confused that this would be a significant or a reliable source of information, given a previous statement by one of the witnesses that oftentimes items are stolen on a regular basis. It makes sense to me that whatever is in that person's pocket would decrease the significance of the reliability of that source of information, making the whole idea of a statutory declaration in question. Did I mishear any of the witnesses on that point?