Okay.
The last question would be to anyone on the panel. Do they disagree with the idea of having universal enumeration, as opposed to targeted enumeration? Secondly, do they believe another way of dealing with it, instead of vouching, is a statutory declaration, as they have in B.C.? I'll submit this to the committee later. That's very simple. It says that the person, wherever they're situated, whatever city, is a Canadian citizen of a certain age--18 years of age or older--and they simply sign and declare, make a statutory declaration, that they are who they are to get a ballot, as opposed to what we have.
The idea here, Mr. Chair, is universal enumeration first, and after that a mechanism for a declaration. It could be specific to the poll as well, given concerns about duplication. I haven't shown this to anyone, including people here, but do you think that method would make sense and would be a little more streamlined and understood? You wouldn't have someone vouching, but you'd have a statutory declaration. Obviously the language concerns would have to be addressed. Do you see any problems with that process?