Thank you, Mr. Chair.
If we read the proposed language here, we see:
suggest that it is intended to refer to that person, the person shall not be allowed to vote unless he or she takes the prescribed oath.
We are just taking that language and...the proposal here is:
person, the person shall be allowed to vote if he or she takes the prescribed oath.
It's simply changing the way in which this is declared. If you will, it takes negative attributes out of the clause and puts a more positive light onto it. It's saying that when the person takes the oath, the person shall be allowed to vote.