I will just repeat a comment that I made last Tuesday, of concern. That is with respect to the second subsections referring to parties not officially recognized.
I understand, and the clerk gave us the benefit of the conventional interpretation of that, but my concern remains that there might be an interpretation to suggest that members of parties not recognized, by not being independents, might not have any opportunity to pose questions.
I think the clerk's answer was that by convention the Speaker will proportionately take that into account and provide the opportunity.
But since my concerns expressed on Tuesday, members may have seen that Elizabeth May has expressed some concerns in the same way. I think if we were able to give some assurance to her or other people who might be in that situation, that might stop some of the public discourse and concern.