Which party? I don't know. I can't keep track of you guys.
How would this amendment affect that situation? In other words, if someone who has incurred debt crosses the floor to another party—they walk away—with this amendment, what would happen? Would this affect that at all?
This is just a question about Mr. Lukiwski's concern about this amendment affecting the intent and thrust of the bill, and secondly about the situation in which someone crosses the floor and leaves the party and leaves the debt behind.