On a point of order, Mr. Chair, I wish I could understand your way of looking at this. And bear with me, I'm asking you to explain it to me.
You permitted the removal of clause 4 totally because the day to which this clause relates will not exist according to the changes we'd made previously. Right? My understanding is that this change, lines 11 and 12 being replaced by section (a) of NDP-1, is based on the same premise that the day will not exist and therefore we can't relate to it. Why would you let the first one go and not the second one?