I apologize to Mr. Reid for cutting him off.
This is a point of order, but it's also a point of clarification, Mr. Chair.
Are we sure that we're on the right track? This has all been debated prior to this meeting. We are now at the clause-by-clause meeting. I can appreciate that people have opinions, and people want to talk on whatever amendments, changes, or interpretations there might be. But are you convinced, Mr. Chair, that you are allowed to let individuals speak more than one time?
The purpose of my question is that there are many clauses to be looked at, regardless of who brings in amendments, corrections, or changes. At the rate we are going now—and I'm not saying anybody is filibustering, I'm not accusing anybody, and I think everybody has the right to his or her opinion—I don't think we'll get home for Christmas.