I don't want to reread the amendment in its entirety, but what it does is replace part of a section, the first paragraph, section 176.1, proposed, by the idea of a "pilot project providing for an additional day of advance polling on the day before polling day" in the case of by-elections.
So the rest of the section is left as is because there have to be modalities provided for holding that election as part of a pilot project. That is why it was not struck out, and at the end, another amendment is added that you have on the next page, which is section 176.11, to make the whole thing consistent.
It is clear that if our amendment were rejected, we would be voting against clause 8 as a whole. What have been retained in clause 8 are the modalities needed so that the pilot project can be conducted.
I agree with Ms. Redman that if our amendment were not passed, the entire clause would have to be deleted. But if we agree on the idea of a pilot project, we also have to provide for the modalities of holding these advance polling stations on the Sunday, the day before polling day, in by-elections.