I know that you are trained as an economist.
However, here is something that will help the members of the committee in their interpretation task: given that the legislator does not speak for no reason, if a bill or a constitutional instrument does not prevent or prohibit something from being done, the corollary is that that thing is permitted.
If there is nothing in the legislation that prevents this application and this recognition of the French fact in Quebec... There is nothing in the Constitution that says that this is prohibited,right?