In my opinion, the only difference is that language is much more significant.
You are getting to the very heart of the problem, which I am also prepared to address. Essentially, with respect to language of work, we want to give the 8% of workers who fall under federal jurisdiction the same right as other wage earners, that is to say, the 92% of workers who have the right to work in French. It is not an obligation incumbent upon individuals.
However, companies would have the obligation of allowing people to work in French, which takes nothing away from the anglophone minority, which as you know, is a group that already enjoys a certain number of rights and privileges under the French language charter.
Absolutely nothing is being taken away.