Yes, but that wasn't the point I was getting to, because I understood that particular point in your explanation very clearly. It was the question of skills training.
I think there was some confusion because when the issue of skills training was raised to you it was raised in the context of employment insurance. Your response, which was an excellent response, was that, yes, there is a program or a policy where we do reimburse the cost of continuing education courses, etc. But that implies the person is actually at work. It is completely different from skills training for someone who is actually receiving employment insurance benefits. Under that case, it's the employer—and they may not be employees of yours.... A company or an organization is prepared to put into a place a program of skills training for unemployed people who are eligible and receiving unemployment benefits, and while they're collecting their employment insurance they are receiving this training.
I'm sure that every single MP here has companies and organizations in his or her riding that provide those kinds of services. What they basically do is look at the landscape of who the people are within a particular geographical area—for instance, it could be a sectoral area—who are unemployed. Chances are they will come off their unemployment and still not be able to get a job, for a variety of reasons. One of those reasons may be skills. Programs are actually put into place. In some cases, funding is received from the provincial government, from the federal government, in order to provide that training. The person is receiving employment insurance.
That is something you might wish to look into as well.