Sure. I won't use all of that.
My objective was to provide a rejoinder to what Charlie had raised. Charlie talked a little bit about the way in which copyright can be used with an eye to respecting artists' creations.
I think there are many merits to that model for artistic creations. I would hesitate to use it for anything political, because it's pointless, just as you don't want to use something relating to an artistic creation to denigrate the artist, diminish their overall artistic production, or turn the piece of art into something that's the opposite of its intended purpose. That's one thing.
But trying to denigrate us and cause us to lose our jobs is what elections are about, right? It's about one group of people trying to take the job away from the other person, and it seems like a preferable alternative to revolutions, coups d'état, or the alternative ways we could have of changing governments.
As you can probably tell from my earlier intervention in favour of pretty wide-open use of this stuff, I think you either have to come down in favour of wide-open use for everybody or no use by anybody, including the members themselves. It actually should be fairly easy to police the members themselves, such as the use of their own video on their own website. It's just an editorial more than anything else.