The words “reproduction is accurate” are in the general notice. That doesn't mean there is no misrepresentation. “Accurate” could mean you've left out a significant portion that would change the meaning of what you reproduce, or it could mean you've tampered with it.
My own thought is that saying the reproduction must be accurate is more than just saying you haven't actually tampered with it; you've not taken something out of the context. We would obviously make a judgment in each case, and if so instructed by the House, we would take action against persons who were reproducing the House proceedings in a manner that's not accurate.
