Exactly. Obviously, he did it with a very precise objective in mind, which I do not question. After all, we are politicians and not members of some church group or bridge club. He obviously did it to annoy the opposition. It was well planned. We could not expect him to say that he seriously considered proroguing the House on December 30 because he wanted to change the composition of the Senate and cool down the special committee on the Canadian mission in Afghanistan which was becoming rather hot, if I may use that phrase.
Mr. Walsh confirmed that the Prime Minister has a political role in this exercise and the Governor General a judicial role.
So I do not understand your comment.