It seems to me that this has significant implications in that, effectively, prorogation in the event.... I'll start with in the event of an electorate that doesn't support the government; it's just simply a way of putting off the inevitable.
I suppose that in the event as we had in 2008-2009, that of a situation in which the House of Commons hadn't supported or, given a chance to vote, wouldn't have supported the government, but in the event of an election, the voters, it seems, would have re-elected the government and perhaps given it a majority based upon the considerations that the electorate was applying at the time and what the polls say....
I struggle with how one empowers the House of Commons to a greater degree through rule changes without effectively disempowering the voters. I want your thoughts on that, if you could, please.