This is what I was alluding to, that consideration should be given. What you should be aiming for is a greater simplicity in terms of what a referendum committee and a third party can do and what their obligations are.
There might be a slight variation, in that under a referendum scenario or a joint scenario where two are being held together, it might be possible for a union, a corporation, or an association to form a referendum committee but not be able to make any contribution to it. Others would have to make contributions to it, but under the same scheme, only its advertising expenditures would be controlled. So you don't really care how much they spend trying to get organized. If they want to spend their money foolishly, that's up to them. Right now, under the third party regime, all you control are advertising moneys. That's all you control. That's because a decision was made, which I think was a wise one, to only control that.