I'm from Kingston, so we know about them.
You can also just leave it at contempt. That is normally what happens to these things.
On the other hand, if the committee feels that even with the additional information that's being given it has not had time to assess it, you can report that. You can say that the initial materials given by the government were inadequate to the point that the government had failed to comply. You can also do a quick dip into the materials.
For example, you could look and see if there are adequate cost projections, if the provincial costs have been included or not. If they have done, on the crime bills, for example, an adequate assessment of how the criminal population will be affected by these, you could do this as quickly as you can.
I have not seen the amount of documentation, but my impression is that if everybody in this committee stopped talking to me right now and started reading the documents, you wouldn't be finished before July. I really don't understand how you can come to a firm answer.
You can say this is progress, but the only genuine progress will be to create a way of living with government, a modus vivendi, that ensures that this kind of thing doesn't happen again. That is where my proposals are trying to point you on both sides of the House.