Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Professor Franks--through the chair, of course. It's really great to have you here, with your wealth of knowledge and experience that informs our deliberations here today and that I would like to see inform our conduct and our parliamentary reforms as we move forward.
Earlier you spoke of types of contempt. Would you say that this breach of privilege in the Speaker's ruling would qualify as one or both possible types of contempt: without reasonable excuse, refusing to answer a question or provide information or produce papers; or deliberately altering, suppressing, concealing, or...? Would you believe that this particular breach would qualify as a type of contempt?