I don't disagree with you on that particular point.
I wanted to go to another area, which has to do with why we're here. There has been a finding of prima facie breach of privilege. Privilege is a core concept in a functioning parliamentary democracy. It's so important to a functioning parliamentary democracy that everything else stops while the issue is dealt with. It takes priority over all else.
That issue presumably would then translate into a committee in that all other matters in the committee would stop while the issue that's referred to the committee is dealt with. If a privilege issue is referred to the committee, it's dealt with as a priority over all other issues.
Would you be of the view that any delaying motions, any dilatory motions, any filibustering, and any other matters that would delay the committee arriving at a report in a timely fashion, as instructed by the House, would in fact be a fresh form of contempt?