Thank you, Ms. Corkery, for being here today.
I've talked to clergy in my home riding of Oakville. We have one synagogue in Oakville. I call the rabbi my rabbi, although I'm an Anglican. We've discussed this issue at length.
I have some questions about a section from one of your documents on the website about ending partnerships, which is a difficult thing to do. It says:
Kairos partnerships in the work of global justice are generally long term. However, they are not necessarily forever. This policy helps ensure that partnerships may be ended, if need be, in a transparent, equitable and fair manner.
There are some circumstances listed that may lead to the ending of a partnership. I'll just read you the first one, if I may. It says:
Changes in the political, social, or economic context--and our analysis of how Kairos can most effectively help--indicate that we need to give priority, with our limited resources, to new areas of work.
Isn't that really what CIDA has said to Kairos? If you replaced the word “Kairos” with “CIDA” you'd say, “our analysis of how CIDA can most effectively help”--you know that the minister's priorities are food, medicine, education, and aid in Africa, for example, rather than advocacy--and, “indicate that we need to give priority, with our limited resources, to new areas of work”.
So when CIDA ends a relationship, it's really doing what Kairos does when it has to end a relationship.